<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Artificial Intelligence on  Citizens&#39; Press</title>
    <link>https://cpress.org/categories/artificial-intelligence/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Artificial Intelligence on  Citizens&#39; Press</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://cpress.org/categories/artificial-intelligence/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>AI-driven automation process</title>
      <link>https://cpress.org/post/occ-tcc/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://cpress.org/post/occ-tcc/</guid>
      <description>&lt;div id=&#34;outline-container-headline-1&#34; class=&#34;outline-2&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;headline-1&#34;&gt;&#xA;Introduction (and some clarity)&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;div id=&#34;outline-text-headline-1&#34; class=&#34;outline-text-2&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;Why bring Organic Composition of Capital (OCC) and Technical Composition of Capital (TCC) into the analysis of AI?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;The shift in software development has been from a fairly balanced process of automation and capital investment (growth in OCC) to a sudden increase in machine investment at the expense of employment (TCC). The explicit goal of these large AI tech firms companies is full automation of this workforce.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can there be pro-worker AI under a deregulated capitalism?</title>
      <link>https://cpress.org/post/pro-worker-ai/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://cpress.org/post/pro-worker-ai/</guid>
      <description>&lt;div id=&#34;outline-container-headline-1&#34; class=&#34;outline-2&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;headline-1&#34;&gt;&#xA;Technology as discrete forms of automation vs augmentation&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;div id=&#34;outline-text-headline-1&#34; class=&#34;outline-text-2&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;First, the &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.brookings.edu/articles/building-pro-worker-ai/&#34;&gt;Brookings report&lt;/a&gt; identifies five categories of technology:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Labor-augmenting&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Capital-augmenting&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Automating&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Expertise-levelling&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;New task-creating&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Their main focus is the call for for “New task-creating” tools for business to allow these firms to make nice choices for workers to promote augmentation.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;The first mistake that they make is that these “categories” are not distinct/isolated. As I have outlined in my presentations, they are part of a spectrum/continuum real firms follow in the introduction of automation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
